Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:41

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
U.S. budget deficit hit $316 billion in May, with annual shortfall up 14% from a year ago - CNBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is it called iOS 26? What happened to iOS 19 for iPhone - 9to5Mac
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How do you confront your own family for not inviting you or leaving you out of things?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
My Tried and True Trick to Combine Multiple PDFs Free on Windows and Mac - CNET
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
What is your reaction to the controversial remarks made on YouTube show "India's Got Latent"?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.